Arcaevo vs Zoe: which should you choose?
Zoe is a food-first programme centred on gut health and blood-sugar responses. Arcaevo is bloods-first across five body systems with clinician review — so choose Zoe if your priority is personalised nutrition and glucose, and Arcaevo if you want a whole-body biomarker programme that fuses wearables and proves change.
At a glance
| DIMENSION | Arcaevo | Zoe |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | 5 systems, bloods-first | Gut, glucose, nutrition |
| Core method | Bloods + wearable fusion | CGM + gut test + food logs |
| Interpretation | Ranked plan + coach | Food scores & guidance |
| Clinician review | Every panel | Nutrition science team |
| Change detection | Your baseline + RCV | Personal food responses |
| Data residency | EU, never sold | UK / USA |
| Best for | Whole-body optimisation | Diet personalisation |
The honest take
Zoe is excellent at one important thing: understanding how your body responds to food, using CGM and gut testing. If diet personalisation is your goal, it's a standout.
Arcaevo is broader and bloods-first. We look across five systems, fuse wearable signals, keep a registered clinician in the loop, and prove changes with RCV — a different job than optimising your plate, and often a complementary one.
People also ask
Can I use Zoe and Arcaevo together?
Yes — they're complementary. Zoe optimises your nutrition; Arcaevo tracks the whole-body biomarker picture and whether changes (including dietary ones) actually moved your markers.
Does Arcaevo include a CGM?
Not as standard. Arcaevo focuses on blood biomarkers fused with wearable data; CGM integration is on the roadmap.
Which is more clinical?
Arcaevo has clinician review of every panel and RCV-based change detection; Zoe is led by nutrition science.
See the difference in your own numbers.
Start with a single test — no membership needed.
Order your first test